Sight & Sound magazine mastheads
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/70256/7025661c7d44cdec1e69e95169d12e4b81809422" alt="S+S_1951.jpg"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f89c8/f89c89271380ff7e43b449fbbc79b47ae8659e9c" alt="S+S_1969.jpg"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2734e/2734e4eeb2cb1e25aeef3d6621142c2fd98472b9" alt="S+S_71.jpg"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/65a67/65a679663535c3447af0304e0d3e286833d3e361" alt="S+S_73.jpg"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/19d07/19d0779cc4651555b5497185df2eb3bd6dc90049" alt="S+S_78.jpg"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f90f4/f90f47ef7587c96bb1c4ba19de8601db937f3d5d" alt="S+S_83.jpg"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e49c9/e49c98a3ae8f3a78d9cd512f1f960f42e8f8bcbf" alt="S+S_92.jpg"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0e91a/0e91a51bfc89f54e2fd20a359dd0fb858f19bb6f" alt="S+S_2000.jpg"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e6400/e6400f9067519f036a20eac25fc9264851bfc46d" alt="S+S_2002.jpg"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bdae9/bdae9b9b439735cd1cb7f135e55f41d1dd107094" alt="S+S_09.jpg"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f6724/f67246360922bf5a7026e0f7d0e4deeed99fcc35" alt="S+S_2010s.jpg"
The UK film magazine Sight & Sound has been going since the 1930s and has changed its masthead more times than I change my shirts. At first I thought they changed it every decade, until I noticed there were three different ones in the 1970s. The magazine was very wordy for a long time up until the 1970s and 80s, but by the 1990s it drastically changed, turned monthly (rather than seasonal) and became a lot more visual, which makes sense for a film magazine. Even so, a magazine like Variety, say, has had the same masthead for about a hundred years. I don’t mind a new masthead every few years but Sight and Sound’s lack of a strong visual identity (it looked awful in the 1980s) is a problem for a visual-based magazine. Still, it’s always been my film magazine of choice.
From top to bottom: 1951; 1969; 1971; 1973; 1978; 1983; 1992; 2000; 2002; 2009; 2014, its current incarnation.
Previously on Barnflakes
Sight & Sound covers